Likes: 0
Results 11 to 17 of 17
Thread: Which Core?
-
08-08-10, 11:09 AM #11
Register to remove this ad+ lol
› See More: Which Core?No touching please.
-
08-08-10, 11:56 AM #12
I fail because I'm not a brainless sheep that follows everyone else? It's NOT a fact that ArcEmu is bad in all ways, considering people still use it. It's your opinion. Next time, use your brain before posting...
Retard.
-
08-08-10, 12:17 PM #13
"considering people still use it"
By that you meen all the new people thats being told by noobs that Arcemu is the best core?
I agree its an easy core but its bad.
No touching please.
-
08-08-10, 06:24 PM #14
No, in your opinion it's bad, in other's it's not... I'm not debating about whether it is or not, it's just retarded how people can't see others can have their own point of view without people saying "omg your wrong"
****ing idiots...
-
08-08-10, 07:08 PM #15
-
08-08-10, 09:48 PM #16
I think that the only good thing about ArcEmu is that it's noob friendly.
Leecher - 01/07/10!
Active Member - 05/07/10!
Moderator - 14/08/10!
Contributor - 15/09/10!
-
11-08-10, 06:25 AM #17
Register to remove this adwhen you tell me whats easier with arcemu then MaNGOS based cores ill trust you, i mean mangos got almost everything database handled and that means that a nub that cant compile the core can as example fix the proc chance on a trinket.... also its only one creature table wich makes it easier for nubs to find what they want on their creatures, i remember first time i made a wow server i didnt know what creature_proto where.
I mean sure its maby harder in some cases because everything really is configurable without modding the core but just dont touch that and its easier:P exept git its a ***** mercurial is much easier :P
// LilleWhos dat "LilleCarl"
Its LilleCarl OMGBBQLOLZXD