[OFFICIAL] - WoW-Pwnage Entertainment | 2: 3.x.x Realms | Stable | Lagfree

[mako]

http://www.wow-pwnage.com/site/wowp.gifhttp://i641.photobucket.com/albums/uu137/vrevrag/WoW-Pwnage.gif
WoW-Pwnage & Illustrious WoW Entertainment Presents: A new Era in World of Warcraft Private Servers!
Most Stable 3.1 Emulator Anywhere!
Professionally managed Dual Quad Core Xeon Dedicated Servers!
Completely LagFree!
Always Latest Patch Supported!

3.1.3 Supported!

Website: WoW-Pwnage - News (http://www.wow-pwnage.com/)


2 Realms:

Area52 Battlegrounds: 3.1.3 Blizzlike PvP

-Instant 80
-REAL Season 6
-REAL Tier 8 - 8,5
-Line of Sight
-Free season 5(deadly)
-No custom items
-No Overpowered donors
-Pure Blizzlike PvP
-Private Emulator
-Alterac Valley
-All arenas working (yes ring of valor and dalaran sewers too)
-Strand of the Ancients Battleground


Illustrious: 3.1.3 Instant 80 Funserver

-Ulduar FULLY spawned
-Tier 8 - 8,5 available
-Free tier 7 on creation
-Tons of custom gear
-Vote rewards
-Instant 80
-Naxxramas / Obsidian Sanctum / Vault Of Archavon / Eye of Eternity
-Strand of the Ancients Battleground

[Avidgamer]

Approved. Good luck.

[mako]

thanks

[mako]

**Updated Thread Info**

[Blacklisted]

Just wondering, how big is your player base?

[mako]

Well playerbase is realm specific but here is the "average"

Illustrious fun - 100

Area52 BG/arena - 250

again this is the weekday average - we have peaked at around 600 on the area 52 and a peak of 400 on the illustrious fun, but thats usaully weekends/evenings

[Blacklisted]

Hmm, not bad. :) I might try it out some time ;)

[mako]

you should, it's good fun :p

[Blacklisted]

haha, I had my own private server for a long time. 200 people peak 100 constantly. This realm looks interesting :)

[Onlykl]

Why yo dont make on funserver realm max lvl 255 or bigger?

[Blacklisted]

It becomes a chore to ballance PvP, With Costum gear, bugged tallents etc etc. Have you played Kamical WoW Onlykl?

[mako]

because anything past blizzards highest level (80 atm) isn't very stable and can become very buggy, and we don't want that, and i also see no point in higher levels, it's the same only a bigger number, less things work and spells which are for a character over 100 levels below you, it just doesn't make sense

[Onlykl]

if you are good scripter you can fix that.... its easy.... if you are C++ scripter then yo should know to fix that....

Blacklisted: i think i played xD

[mako]

it would take more than 1 to do it and, why waste time on that when there are many bugs/spellfixes to do? and memory leaks to fix, pointer systems need to be fixed/re-written, theres alot to do other than trying to develop an emulated game further than the retail version, Not to mention having our Own emulator and keeping that up to date with the latest Blizzard patches/changes, go ask arcemu why they havn't made support for levels above 80. GG

[Onlykl]

lol okay...

[mako]

new record, 400+ people on our 2 main realms funserver and PvP